Chinese social media:
“乌克兰肉店展品引发恐慌，像极了一条人腿，后证实是鸵鸟腿肉”
“Ukrainian meat shop display causes panic — it looks exactly like a human leg. Later confirmed to be ostrich leg meat.”
They know most people only glance at the first line before sharing.
Even
时政
(
twitter.com
)
Chinese social media:
“乌克兰肉店展品引发恐慌，像极了一条人腿，后证实是鸵鸟腿肉”
“Ukrainian meat shop display causes panic — it looks exactly like a human leg. Later confirmed to be ostrich leg meat.”
They know most people only glance at the first line before sharing.
Even though the “ostrich” correction is written right there, they still chose to open with “Ukraine.”
This meat is from a Dubai supermarket.
Price tags show Indian mutton and Pakistani beef. The original Instagram poster filmed it in Dubai and confirmed it’s a beef leg.
No Ukraine. No ostrich. No human remains.
So why force “Ukraine” into the caption?
Because the goal isn’t accuracy.
It’s to plant the visual association: Ukraine = desperation = something that looks like cannibalism.
In the Chinese information space, this kind of framing doesn’t need to be true. It just needs to feel consistent with the existing narrative that Ukraine is collapsing and barbaric.
They put Ukraine there on purpose.
点击图片查看原图
