What exactly are you referring to when you say Tulsi "exposed Fauci and the deep state"?

I've actually read the documents she declassified. If you've followed the congressional hearings, intelligence reviews, and Fauci testimony over the last several years, there is very little that's new in Tulsi's supposed "bombshell" release.

What's interesting is that many people are now using these document releases to dismiss the recent WaPo reporting about Tulsi as a "hit piece" because she supposedly exposed some massive scandal.

But what exactly did she expose?

The COVID documents basically show:

• Researchers believed all the necessary conditions for an accidental release of a lab-modified coronavirus existed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

• Because of that, a lab-related origin was being seriously considered alongside the natural spillover theory.

• U.S.-funded EcoHealth Alliance research involved collaboration with Wuhan researchers studying bat coronaviruses.

THAT'S IT.

Now, the government was definitely too quick to publicly dismiss the lab-leak hypothesis in 2020. The government also should NOT have been pressuring social media companies to suppress certain COVID-related content. That is exactly why so many people became convinced there was a massive conspiracy & that their government was lying to them.

Never again.

Importantly, though, these documents do NOT show that officials secretly knew COVID came from a lab. They do NOT show that scientists had proof of a lab leak and buried it. They do NOT show a coordinated coverup, despite the way the accompanying press release was written.

The documents show scientists & intelligence analysts debating competing hypotheses in real time while dealing with incomplete information. Pretty normal stuff, actually.

There is no smoking gun. No proof of engineering. No proof of a cover-up. No proof that COVID originated from a lab leak.

The conclusion remains exactly where it's been for years:

• A lab leak remains plausible.
• Natural spillover remains plausible.
• We still don't know.

And six years later, we may never know.

So if you think Tulsi revealed some earth-shattering new fact, tell me specifically what it was.

What new information did you learn from these documents that wasn't already public? Because I've read them, and I'm not seeing it.