Why am Epstein style expose will not happen in China.

A male researcher went deep into 8 kindergartens across four provinces, entered both girls’ and boys’ toilets, and conducted 265 hours (53 sessions, each lasting up to 5 hours) of observation on highly private scenes of 3–6-year-old children, including their defecation and urination postures, details of body exposure, etc.

The paper also records in great detail every specific behavior of the children, such as:
“Girl squatted and urinated on her own shoe.”

“Boy had his buttocks forcibly spread open by the teacher for public inspection.”
“Child was scolded while changing pants with bare bottom exposed.”

A male researcher conducted four years of toilet observation on young children. Every segment reads like a horror story.

How was this project approved and initiated?

How did it receive funding?

What role did China Women’s University play in this?

Did his Peking University sociology background provide him with institutional cover?

How did it pass ethical review?

How did he convince the kindergartens under the guise of “academic research”?

Conducting “field observation” on children who have no civil capacity and without obtaining consent from the powerless young children or their parents — was this done to “avoid influencing the experimental results,” or was it blatant criminal behavior under the circumstances of extreme power imbalance?

It should be noted that the samples include not only public kindergartens in Beijing, but also those in remote rural areas. None of these questions have been answered so far.

The project approval date is unknown. The observation period was 2016–2020. In 2024 he transferred from China Women’s University to the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The paper was published in 2025.

This is no longer merely an issue of academic ethics — it is a question of how academia can so openly serve as a fig leaf for blatant crime.

点击图片查看原图

点击图片查看原图

点击图片查看原图