🚨GROKIPEDIA VS WIKIPEDIA: THE IVERMECTIN TRUTH TEST
Wikipedia treats ivermectin like toxic waste, framing everything through "misinformation" warnings.
They even cite the FDA's "you're not a horse" tweet as if it's peer-reviewed science.
Grokipedia actually explains the
btc
(
twitter.com
)
🚨GROKIPEDIA VS WIKIPEDIA: THE IVERMECTIN TRUTH TEST
Wikipedia treats ivermectin like toxic waste, framing everything through "misinformation" warnings.
They even cite the FDA's "you're not a horse" tweet as if it's peer-reviewed science.
Grokipedia actually explains the drug's Nobel Prize-winning history, legitimate medical uses, and why researchers tested it for COVID.
Failed studies get mentioned alongside successful ones... no agenda, just facts.
One site writes like reputation management for Big Pharma.
The other writes like an encyclopedia should.
Wikipedia turned from crowd-sourced knowledge into crowd-sourced propaganda.
The difference shows why alternative platforms are winning.
Source: @Grokipedia / Wikipedia Comparison
点击图片查看原图
点击图片查看原图
