We note the response of the Hong Kong SAR to our statement on Jimmy Lai's sham trial, though wish its impressive length had been matched in content and accuracy. IPAC is not 'certain anti-China politicians from Britain and Europe' as alleged, but a coalition of 350 politicians in…
时政
(
twitter.com
)
We note the response of the Hong Kong SAR to our statement on Jimmy Lai's sham trial, though wish its impressive length had been matched in content and accuracy. IPAC is not 'certain anti-China politicians from Britain and Europe' as alleged, but a coalition of 350 politicians in 33 countries, with its largest contingent in Asia.
One fact is clear from the HKSAR reply: in Hong Kong the government decides the guilt of a defendant, forces facts to fit the narrative, and then demands that nobody outside the government notices.
Let us be clear: this case relies upon coerced testimony extracted from torture victims to prop up lies about Jimmy Lai's work.
点击图片查看原图
点击图片查看原图
