3371 位用户此时在线
24小时点击排行 Top 10：
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高，信息越新，排列越靠前
2
1
0
1
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
2
1
1
4
2
1
1
5
2
1
1
6
Marc Andreessen: “I’ve only met two people who are completely transparent in public about what they say in private: Elon and Trump.”
2
1
1
Marc Andreessen: “I’ve only met two people who are completely transparent in public about what they say in private: Elon and Trump.”
“When Elon says something, it sounds like crazy shit, but in his mind, it's true. Is he always right? No. Sometimes the rockets crash, sometimes
btc
(
twitter.com)
00:00:55
7
2
1
1
8
2
1
1
9
2
1
1
10
2
1
1
11
2
1
1
12
3
2
2
13
Russia always denies it, but they started WW2 together with Germany.
2
1
1
Russia always denies it, but they started WW2 together with Germany.
On September 17, 1939, the Soviet Red Army invaded Poland, splitting the country in half with Germany as previously agreed between the two.
This video shows the joint German-Soviet victory parade on Sep. 22nd
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:00:45
14
2
1
1
15
JUST NOW—3 Tibetan youth activists drop a banner on the Moscone Center where the APEC Summit will start in <24hrs
2
1
1
JUST NOW—3 Tibetan youth activists drop a banner on the Moscone Center where the APEC Summit will start in <24hrs
Xi can’t hide from the countless people united against his authoritarian regime
Generations of Tibetans will always resist his dictatorship until Tibet is free.
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:00:44
16
2
1
1
17
3
2
2
18
2
1
1
19
2
1
1
20
Did China ever learn from the mistakes of its own past?
2
1
1
Did China ever learn from the mistakes of its own past?
Did China understand that imperialism and one-man authoritarian rule always lead to the same historical cycle — one that lasts roughly 300 years before collapse?
Mao Zedong once spoke of China’s “historical cycle of rise
时政
(
twitter.com)
•
勃勃OC
21
2
1
1
22
2
1
1
23
2
1
1
24
2
1
1
25
This is trending in Chinese media, for all the wrong reasons.
2
1
1
This is trending in Chinese media, for all the wrong reasons.
A “QC check” where an operator claims to feel part thickness by how a machine rolls it. No gauges. No tolerances. No traceability. Just intuition presented as process.
What’s changed isn’t that this exists—it always
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:00:44