2423 位用户此时在线
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高，信息越新，排列越靠前
Göbekli Tepe is a Neolithic settlement inhabited from c. 9500 to at least 8000 BCE, in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey.
Its structures are therefore 11,000 years old, or more, 6,000 years before Stonehenge and the great pyramids of Giza, making them humanity's oldest…
有趣
(
twitter.com
)
Göbekli Tepe is a Neolithic settlement inhabited from c. 9500 to at least 8000 BCE, in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey.
Its structures are therefore 11,000 years old, or more, 6,000 years before Stonehenge and the great pyramids of Giza, making them humanity's oldest known monumental site, built not for shelter but for some other purpose.
Archaeologists still consider the place a mysterious riddle that predates Earth's great civilizations by thousands of years.
Many things if not everything in Göbekli Tepe constitute an issue in explaining why, how and when. From the techniques used to erect the monoliths without the help of animals to the fact that no habitative human settlements were found near this temple except the ruins of what was possibly a small village.
The site was believed to be a shrine, a temple, but hypotheses have been made about the structures being an astronomical observatory due to its configuration and alignment with different stars, particularly Sirius.
Discoveries in the region suggest a pivotal moment, marking the onset of revolutions in agriculture, religion, and society. The complex of temples or shrines at Göbekli Tepe might have symbolized fertility, life, or abundance, given the presence of reliefs depicting animals.
The people of Göbekli Tepe, with sufficient natural resources, found the time to write a new chapter in the history of life. Archaeologists have read only a small part of that story.
点击图片查看原图
Chinese wumao accounts are at it again. This is exactly why accurate translation matters.
In this case, a video of a foreign person speaking a language most viewers do not understand was reposted with a completely unrelated political caption. Because viewers cannot verify the
时政
(
twitter.com)
Advertisement spotted in China:
“Public opinion guidance · Comment control · Crisis suppression · Keyword cleansing.”
This isn’t PR. It’s an industry.
When narrative management is openly sold as a service, the question is no longer whether opinion is shaped — but who gets to
时政
(
twitter.com)
I’ve lost a lot of paid subscribers on X for my posts explaining why TikTok being owned by a China-based company is a huge privacy and national security risk for Americans. ByteDance already has a history of spying on American journalists through TikTok, for example.
I was a bit
时政
(
twitter.com)