5347 位用户此时在线
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高，信息越新，排列越靠前
Wikipedia: "conservatives say the twitter files show what they call 'liberal bias'"
Grokipedia: "here's what the twitter files found, specifically, the mechanism for algorithmic demotion, how it was applied, and you can click to read them it detail"
The spin in wikipedia is
btc
(
twitter.com
)
Wikipedia: "conservatives say the twitter files show what they call 'liberal bias'"
Grokipedia: "here's what the twitter files found, specifically, the mechanism for algorithmic demotion, how it was applied, and you can click to read them it detail"
The spin in wikipedia is insane
Grokipedia is so much more clear and unbiased.
I knew wikipedia was biased, but this is pretty insane
点击图片查看原图
点击图片查看原图
Just browsing multiple topics on Grokipedia...everything controversial.
It's so much more fair than Wikipedia. No...wait...it wipes Wikipedia on the floor and stomps on it.
Wikipedia's key flaw is that it only allows "approved sources" which are all controlled and ideologically
btc
(
twitter.com)