3571 位用户此时在线
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高，信息越新，排列越靠前
Grok 4 Heavy (left) V.s. Gemini 2.5 Pro (right)
Create a Turing-complete Scheme interpreter in C that supports lexical scoping, closures, continuations, and proper tail-call for tail recursion without stack growth.
Grok4 won. It wrote superior code.
Grok4 Heavy: 903 Lines of C
btc
(
twitter.com
)
Grok 4 Heavy (left) V.s. Gemini 2.5 Pro (right)
Create a Turing-complete Scheme interpreter in C that supports lexical scoping, closures, continuations, and proper tail-call for tail recursion without stack growth.
Grok4 won. It wrote superior code.
Grok4 Heavy: 903 Lines of C code.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 891 Lines of C code.
Both compiled!
The code from Grok 4 Heavy worked flawlessly.
The code from Gemini 2.5 Pro did not work even after multiple prompts.
Grok 4 Heavy: ~10 minutes single prompt.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: ~2-3 minutes per prompt after about 10 prompts I gave up.
Full Prompt👇
点击图片查看原图
Here's Elon Musk expressing his confidence in a fully and rapidly reusable rocket just after seeing the two boosters of Falcon Heavy land for the first time in 2018.
“I didn't really think this would work. Because when I see the rocket lift off, I see a thousand things that
btc
(
twitter.com)
A mother dog delivered her babies or puppies a day before under the thick flowers in our front yard, and the several puppies laid there beneath. A day after, in the afternoon, a heavy rain poured out suddenly and the baby puppies got wet and shivering in cold, crying and whining.…
有趣
(
twitter.com)