5972 位用户此时在线
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高，信息越新，排列越靠前
Grok 4 Heavy (left) V.s. Gemini 2.5 Pro (right)
Create a Turing-complete Scheme interpreter in C that supports lexical scoping, closures, continuations, and proper tail-call for tail recursion without stack growth.
Grok4 won. It wrote superior code.
Grok4 Heavy: 903 Lines of C
btc
(
twitter.com
)
Grok 4 Heavy (left) V.s. Gemini 2.5 Pro (right)
Create a Turing-complete Scheme interpreter in C that supports lexical scoping, closures, continuations, and proper tail-call for tail recursion without stack growth.
Grok4 won. It wrote superior code.
Grok4 Heavy: 903 Lines of C code.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 891 Lines of C code.
Both compiled!
The code from Grok 4 Heavy worked flawlessly.
The code from Gemini 2.5 Pro did not work even after multiple prompts.
Grok 4 Heavy: ~10 minutes single prompt.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: ~2-3 minutes per prompt after about 10 prompts I gave up.
Full Prompt👇
点击图片查看原图
GROK 3 BUILT ANOTHER MULTIPLAYER GAME—NO HUMAN NEEDED
A full game, written in Python, developed almost entirely by Cursor AI, while Grok 3 handled the websocket server.
No human wrote the core gameplay—AI did it all.
This isn’t just automation; it’s AI stepping into the role
btc
(
twitter.com)
This is my couch...I used Grok Vision to check if my plant’s getting the perfect amount of light for healthy growth.....
It did an amazing job... Got spot-on advice instantly
Absolutely love how simple Grok makes it
just point the phone, get instant insights, and done ✅
btc
(
twitter.com)