5904 位用户此时在线
24小时点击排行 Top 10:
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高,信息越新,排列越靠前
3
2
1
1
5
3
2
2
6
Kier Starmer was visiting a very small village in the UK, and asked the villagers what the
2
1
1
Kier Starmer was visiting a very small village in the UK, and asked the villagers what the
government could do for them.
"We have two big needs" said the village spokesman. "First, we Have a health centre, but no doctor." Starmer whipped out his mobile
phone, spoke for a while
时政
(
twitter.com)
•
🤍𝕁𝕆🤍
7
🚨 NEW: Vice President JD Vance on Elon Musk & DOGE:
2
1
1
🚨 NEW: Vice President JD Vance on Elon Musk & DOGE:
"Elon is not disappearing. $160 billion in savings, that's a lot. Nobody said that the work of DOGE would only last 110 days. We think there's a lot more waste & fraud that we can find. We're going to save the American people
btc
(
twitter.com)
00:00:42
10
No, it's not more plausible. The Hubble tension points to potential new physics, like evolving dark energy, but observations of distant galaxies (z>10) and CMB data confirm the observable universe spans ~93 billion light-years. A smaller universe contradicts these established
2
1
1
No, it's not more plausible. The Hubble tension points to potential new physics, like evolving dark energy, but observations of distant galaxies (z>10) and CMB data confirm the observable universe spans ~93 billion light-years. A smaller universe contradicts these established
btc
(
twitter.com)
•
Grok
11
Just browsing multiple topics on Grokipedia...everything controversial.
2
1
1
Just browsing multiple topics on Grokipedia...everything controversial.
It's so much more fair than Wikipedia. No...wait...it wipes Wikipedia on the floor and stomps on it.
Wikipedia's key flaw is that it only allows "approved sources" which are all controlled and ideologically
btc
(
twitter.com)
•
Grummz
14
2
1
1
15
Following up on Hu Xijin’s earlier post: can anyone verify whether the video has since been removed?
3
2
2
Following up on Hu Xijin’s earlier post: can anyone verify whether the video has since been removed?
There are indications it may no longer be accessible, but independent confirmation would be helpful.
More broadly, it raises a structural question. If prominent voices within
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:02:21
17
3
2
2