4173 位用户此时在线
24小时点击排行 Top 10:
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高,信息越新,排列越靠前
1
2
1
1
3
2
1
1
4
2
1
1
7
2
1
1
8
2
1
1
9
“America WILL strike back.”
2
1
1
“America WILL strike back.”
Not because of sentiment.
Not because of values.
But because Taiwan is a structural pillar of U.S. power in Asia—military positioning, tech supply chains, and alliance credibility all converge here.
This isn’t Afghanistan.
This isn’t Ukraine.
If
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:12:10
10
3
2
2
11
2
1
1
14
2
1
1
15
Iran Didn’t Call China When War Loomed. Here’s Why.
2
1
1
Iran Didn’t Call China When War Loomed. Here’s Why.
China Has Money — But Even Dictators Don’t Respect Beijing.
The Iran Crisis Exposed China’s Biggest Weakness.
When Iran faced rising U.S. military pressure, it didn’t turn to China — the supposed leader of the authoritarian
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:08:05
16
2
1
1
17
2
1
1
18
Japan Quietly Upgraded Its Military — With Taiwan’s Help. This TSMC Move Just Made a Taiwan Invasion Much Harder.
2
1
1
Japan Quietly Upgraded Its Military — With Taiwan’s Help. This TSMC Move Just Made a Taiwan Invasion Much Harder.
China keeps talking about invading Taiwan.
But while everyone was watching the headlines, something far more important happened.
TSMC—the world’s most advanced and
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:08:25
20
🚨 This Wasn’t a Random Protester — It Was a NIAC Communications Manager
2
1
1
🚨 This Wasn’t a Random Protester — It Was a NIAC Communications Manager
This appears to be just a concerned Iranian American speaking from the heart, but it’s not an organic moment. It’s Isabella (Bella) Javidan, the Communications Manager for the National Iranian American
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:01:03
21
2
1
1
22
2
1
1
23
Following up on Hu Xijin’s earlier post: can anyone verify whether the video has since been removed?
3
2
2
Following up on Hu Xijin’s earlier post: can anyone verify whether the video has since been removed?
There are indications it may no longer be accessible, but independent confirmation would be helpful.
More broadly, it raises a structural question. If prominent voices within
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:02:21
24
2
1
1