4016 位用户此时在线
24小时点击排行 Top 10:
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高,信息越新,排列越靠前
2
1
0
Scholz has personally blocked #Taurus for months, insisting if #Ukraine hits Russian territory with 🇩🇪weapons it’d make 🇩🇪 a party to the conflict & pull us into the war.
So does think this will mean 🇬🇧 is at war with Russia? Of course not. His excuses are hot air.
时政
(
twitter.com
)
由
Jessica Berlin
提交
1
3
2
2
4
2
1
1
5
2
1
1
7
Key points and statements from President Zelenskyy's interview to Fox News:
2
1
1
Key points and statements from President Zelenskyy's interview to Fox News:
◾️Ukrainians want peace more than anyone.
◾️Ukrainians need peace through strength, with security guarantees, not just a ceasefire that Putin will violate like he already has done with numerous earlier
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:00:23
8
2
1
1
10
2
1
1
11
2
1
1
12
2
1
1
13
2
1
1
14
Many injured as a bulldozer tore through a market at noon, according to reports coming out Beijing’s Fangshan district was hit.
2
1
1
Many injured as a bulldozer tore through a market at noon, according to reports coming out Beijing’s Fangshan district was hit.
Latest: 13 has been killed and many more injured.
Another “retaliatory social incident” , the kind that rarely gets explained, only quietly labeled
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:01:14
17
🚨HUGE: Hakeem Jeffries says even though Pam Bondi was fired, she STILL has to testify.
2
1
1
🚨HUGE: Hakeem Jeffries says even though Pam Bondi was fired, she STILL has to testify.
During an appearance with Scott McFarlane, Jeffries made it crystal clear, getting fired doesn’t magically make accountability disappear.
“Just because Pam Bondi was fired doesn’t mean she
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:00:41
18
2
1
1
20
2
1
1
21
2
1
1
22
2
1
1
23
2
1
1
24
Following up on Hu Xijin’s earlier post: can anyone verify whether the video has since been removed?
3
2
2
Following up on Hu Xijin’s earlier post: can anyone verify whether the video has since been removed?
There are indications it may no longer be accessible, but independent confirmation would be helpful.
More broadly, it raises a structural question. If prominent voices within
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:02:21
25
2
1
1