3305 位用户此时在线
24小时点击排行 Top 10：
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高，信息越新，排列越靠前
2
1
0
If you *only* used SAT to admit to elite colleges, share of admits from top 1% income falls 15.8% → 9.9% and representation from <$200k rises by +8.8%, with no reduction in post-college outcomes.
It's 'holistic review' and 'ban SAT' policy that allows the most wealthy and
时政
(
twitter.com
)
由
Garry Tan
提交
If you *only* used SAT to admit to elite colleges, share of admits from top 1% income falls 15.8% → 9.9% and representation from <$200k rises by +8.8%, with no reduction in post-college outcomes.
It's 'holistic review' and 'ban SAT' policy that allows the most wealthy and powerful to virtue signal while getting an edge.
点击图片查看原图
1
“Europe got rich only by robbery.”
5
4
4
“Europe got rich only by robbery.”
“Some countries are rich only because they have resources.”
Both sound comforting. Both dodge accountability.
Yes — colonialism stole, exploited, and scarred nations.
That’s history.
But if theft alone created development, half the world would
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:02:23
2
2
1
1
3
2
1
1
4
2
1
1
5
2
1
1
6
2
1
1
7
2
1
1
8
2
1
1
9
2
1
1
10
3
2
2
11
2
1
1
12
2
1
1
13
2
1
1
14
3
2
2
15
2
1
1
16
2
1
1
17
2
1
1
19
2
1
1
20
2
1
1
21
2
1
1
22
2
1
1
23
2
1
1
24
2
1
1